Wednesday, October 15, 2008

John’s Joke

I think the big joke was supposed to be kind of like when someone deliberately lies about something to get them so upset they have to check and see if you are lying. Then when they find out the person was lying, they get to laugh that they got you upset in the first place over something that should have been an obvious lie. That is certainly the way this sequence plays out with today’s For Better or For Worse reprint. It something akin to when my son gets a rubber spider and tries to convince his mother it is real. It is that level of a joke.

John makes it seem like he hired his staff based on appearance alone, and even made jokes about it to Elly. Apparently, this caused Elly to need to visit with the new hygienist to verify that John only hired her because she looked like Shania Twain / Cheryl Ladd. After the meeting she finds that John was lying. The woman is not dumb, eye candy. In addition to looking like Shania Twain / Cheryl Ladd, Elly describes her as “interesting, intelligent, witty…and really very nice”. Then John crows about how he fooled Elly. He got Elly to believe that he would hire his staff based on appearance alone, and gives his marriage to Elly as example that looks obviously don’t matter to him.

Why would John do that? What point is he trying to make? There is oftentimes an element of these stories taken from the real life of Lynn Johnston that makes me feel there is a significant part of the story being left out from John’s perspective and we will never know what they are. There are a few clues though:

1. We know that Dr. Rod Johnston did, in fact, hire a dental assistant for his office in Lynn Lake who looked enough like Cheryl Ladd for the interviewer in the CBC interview in 1980 to comment on it.
2. In 2 strips of this sequence, John gets so nervous about Elly’s anger that he is shown nervously sweating over it. In today’s strip, he quickly rewords his statement about her appearance in order to avoid it. And yet, he did not reword his statement about the reason why he hired the hygienist, which did upset Elly. He sweats inconsistently.
3. Elly has taken the time to visit with John’s new worker in order to give her approval.
4. John was so upset over the loss of his prior hygienist, Marie; he used terms to describe her, from which a more-than-a-working relationship could be inferred.

Lynn Johnston’s perspective on these strips is quite obvious, particularly from her Macleans interview:

Q: So that was a dream that you had during your own marriage?

A: Well, [my former husband] worked with beautiful women ever since I met him. He's a dentist. He has hygienists and front-desk girls, and there are usually eight girls around him all the time, and he used to travel to the Native villages taking his staff with him, and people in the town would look at me as if to say, "Well, girl, join the club," because in a small northern mining town there's a lot of horsing around, and the joke was you can steal a man's wife, but you don't touch his woodpile, you know? It was rampant up here.

Here you have Lynn’s theme. Just as Dr. John Patterson hired the Shania Twain hygienist, Dr. Rod Johnston worked with beautiful women. The implication is that if Rod Johnston is man enough to be intimate with all those beautiful women, then Lynn should join in the fun.

Q: Adultery is a form of entertainment where you live?

A: It was recreation. It was like a high school, all these different personalities thrown into this one inescapable place where you had to be there together all the time, whether you wanted to or not, and someone you hated might turn out to be the guy in the bar that you're hitting the sack with next year, you know? I didn't have time for that, nor did I want it, but it was there in the town. But I thought there was safety in numbers if he was with a bunch of girls. And they were all really nice people. But I thought to myself, "If I'm going to be a jealous wife, I'll drive myself crazy."

Here Lynn uses the same language as she used with the hygienist in today’s strip: “and really very nice”. In this context, Lynn is using it as a reason that she should not worry about Rod having an affair, along with the idea that there was more than one woman in his office as protection. Nevertheless, we can tell from the Macleans interview, Lynn Johnston did and still does thinks that way about Rod Johnston and his office staff.

17 Comments:

Anonymous Anonymous said...

The only thing I could think about this strip was, is that Elly's hair, or some kind of fuzzy tam with a pom-pom on top?

Cheating husband, or delusional angry wife...my head hurts. Can't think about that anymore.

11:10 PM  
Blogger DreadedCandiru2 said...

howard,

I think the big joke was supposed to be kind of like when someone deliberately lies about something to get them so upset they have to check and see if you are lying. Then when they find out the person was lying, they get to laugh that they got you upset in the first place over something that should have been an obvious lie.

And yet Elly does not laugh. If I understand april_patterson correctly, the next strip has her complaining to Connie about how John disregards her opinion and thinks of her as ugly. This tells me that John was foolhardy enough to tell a humorless jerk a stretcher.

2:51 AM  
Blogger April Patterson said...

In the collection, the strip that comes right after today's is where the old lady in the supermarket coos over Liz and Mike talks about the things he would have told her had she asked (the one Lynn kind of redrew at the outset of the new-runs). After that is a strip where Elly and Mike have an argument where Elly says Mike "always has to argue with [her]" and Mike maintains that he doesn't. Then the one where Elly's on the phone with her mommy as Liz pulls on unprotected lamp cords, pulls out reams of toilet paper, and tears up newspapers. (We saw this one during the hybrid phase.)

4:26 AM  
Blogger DreadedCandiru2 said...

april_patterson,

That must mean that tomorrow and Saturday's strips will be new-runs that have Elly fume about how John does not appreciate what he has. Lynn HAS to club us all over the head with her main premise: her family are jerks.

6:49 AM  
Blogger howard said...

qnjones,

The only thing I could think about this strip was, is that Elly's hair, or some kind of fuzzy tam with a pom-pom on top?

A toque, I think they call it in Canada.

Cheating husband, or delusional angry wife...my head hurts. Can't think about that anymore.

Me either. October has been, so far, a John-bashing month. After having a John-bashing year with the hybrid, I am quite tired of it too. We were supposed to have Farley in October. Where are those puppy poop jokes I was looking forward to?

6:52 AM  
Blogger howard said...

DreadedCandiru2,

And yet Elly does not laugh. With these kinds of jokes, the point is one-upmanship; so that’s not too surprising.

That must mean that tomorrow and Saturday's strips will be new-runs that have Elly fume about how John does not appreciate what he has. Lynn HAS to club us all over the head with her main premise: her family are jerks.

That is the question. Will Lynn be able to resist the urge to push this main premise yet again?

6:54 AM  
Blogger howard said...

aprilp_katje,

It sounds like the only unreprinted one in the strips next in the collection is the strip where Elly and Mike have an argument where Elly says Mike "always has to argue with [her]" and Mike maintains that he doesn't. Lynn might do that one to fill out the week. I can’t help but think that we are due for a new-run to continue on the hygienist-hiring story somewhat. On the other hand, she did promise Farley in October and I would really like to go there, instead of rehashing her failed marriage over and over again.

6:55 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Maybe LJ could've salvaged her life/self esteem back in the 70s if she would have divorced Rod when she found out he was fooling around with every chick in town. Just because everybody is doing it, doesn't mean you have to go along with it. I would never have admitted in a national interview 30 years later, that I stayed with a cheating husband, just because it was the normal thing in my adopted home. She seems very passive - life just happens to her. Poor poor pitiful Lynn. Divorce in 79, move back to Vancouver, become empowered and maybe you still wouldn't be whining about it now.

7:14 AM  
Blogger howard said...

Anonymous,

I would never have admitted in a national interview 30 years later, that I stayed with a cheating husband, just because it was the normal thing in my adopted home.

She seems very passive - life just happens to her.


She definitely fits into the Michael Patterson style of revenge (write an article denouncing the Kelpfroths) with her revenge over her ex-husband in an endless series of interviews and comic strips chosen to bash her husband.

Poor poor pitiful Lynn. Divorce in 79, move back to Vancouver, become empowered and maybe you still wouldn't be whining about it now.

The thing about this is that she could have easily done this. With her 10-year guaranteed contract, $100K-a-year salary in a job nearly perfect for a stay-at-home mom.

7:29 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

But to think things were really this bad, that means you have to believe what Lynn is saying in the interview.

Just as she has re-vamped the Aaron/carwreck story into the Aaron/suicide story, I believe that Lynn is revising the past to fit what she wants to believe, and what will give her sympathy/attention. Unfortunately, her interviews make me start to cast doubt on all her stories. It seems convenient that she espouses hurtful information when the parties involved are either no longer in her life, either through death or choice.

9:28 AM  
Blogger April Patterson said...

Unfortunately, her interviews make me start to cast doubt on all her stories.

That's been my reaction, too, debjyn. Back when the podcast came out, I e-mailed Steph and asked which version of the Aaron/videotaping/dead-friend story was true. Initially, Steph replied that Lynn was away but she'd ask when she returned. Then she never got back to me. I suspect Lynn was less than forthcoming.

10:09 AM  
Blogger howard said...

debjyn,

Just as she has re-vamped the Aaron/carwreck story into the Aaron/suicide story, I believe that Lynn is revising the past to fit what she wants to believe, and what will give her sympathy/attention.

It was the podcast where she changed that story so dramatically that really caused me to question things. When I went back to her story about being abused by her mother and reread it, I realized in the same article she also said her mother was abused and her father was abused. Although that was possible, there was another part of the story where her father refused to talk to her about her relationship with her mother. If that story was true and her father was tight-lipped about the subject, then how would she ever know about any abuse her mother or father received from their parents? Once you take that first step in disbelief, then it calls into question anything Lynn says.

10:26 AM  
Blogger howard said...

aprilp_katje,

Back when the podcast came out, I e-mailed Steph and asked which version of the Aaron/videotaping/dead-friend story was true. Initially, Steph replied that Lynn was away but she'd ask when she returned. Then she never got back to me. I suspect Lynn was less than forthcoming.

Either that or Stephanie had been around Lynn long enough to realize that there would no use in asking a question like that. The car crash is a more believable story. The suicide hanging in a public park where Aaron would be more concerned about getting a great sunset in the picture was not.

10:27 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

I guess I don't really know what you're all talking about re: the suicide/Aaron thing. I've heard allusions to it, but I don't think I heard that whole story. Please enlighten me?

1:37 PM  
Blogger April Patterson said...

qnjones, it's a reference to Lynn changing the backstory behind the accident Dee had, which ultimately reunited her with Mike. Originally--in Lives Behind the Lines, for example, Lynn had said that this had happened with a friend of Aaron's--she'd gotten into a car accident, Aaron had been on the scene with his video camera, been upset that the news station had used only a small amount of his footage, and found out later that he'd known the girl (who died). In the podcast interview, Lynn changed "car accident" to "suicide by hanging in a public park" and also added the detail of the girl being pregnant.

1:59 PM  
Blogger howard said...

qnjones,

I believe this is the link to the story which has a link to the podcast where Lynn Johnston tells the hanging story.

3:59 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Headache-inducing interview. She never gives a straight/consistent answer about anything.

7:43 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home