Wednesday, February 06, 2008

Putting Kids to Bed Early

In today's For Better or For Worse, Michael Patterson gives up trying with his kids and decides to put them to bed early. The poor schmuck! I remember trying this technique on my kids. It never worked. The moment your back is turned they are stepping out of their room for something. Then you end up having to enforce it by guarding their door. That kind of defeats the purpose. The only time I ever remember it working was when my kids were cranky because they genuinely were tired, and did not have the wherewithal to put themselves to bed.

There is a certain age when that happens. Now, when the kids were very little, they would get cranky and shortly thereafter pass out wherever it was they were. My son would face plant in his food, or fall asleep on a toy, or fall asleep in very unusual sitting positions. It was amazing to see.

As they got older, my kids developed some kind of sense that they could only fall asleep in certain places and in certain kinds of positions. It was when they hit this stage, that the long and elaborate bedtime routines were established: Reading a book, and putting on pyjamas, and brushing of the teeth, the last drink of water, etc. My kids couldn’t go to bed without those rituals. I remember on one occasion deciding to see if the kids could put themselves to bed, by themselves if I let them stay up late enough. Eventually my son got so tired, he begged me to put him to bed.

Now my kids are older, and they are more than capable of putting themselves to bed when they are sleepy. When that started happening, it was like a certain relief not to have to be responsible for doing that, but also a sense of loss that my kids were no longer so young that they needed it.

As for poor Michael Patterson putting his kids to bed, apparently before Deanna has come home and presumably before the kids have had supper (although it is difficult to tell if Deanna comes home before or after supper for the kids). We have Friday and Saturday yet to go, and if Lynn Johnston wants to play this realistically, Mike’s attempt to put the kids to bed early will fail miserably. I am just hoping it will not fail to bring a laugh as the rest of this week has done. Honestly, the idea that a father is incompetent in dealing with his children can be turned into something funny. I just don’t know if Lynn Johnston knows what that funny stuff is.

13 Comments:

Anonymous Anonymous said...

Mike looks a lot like Grandpa Jim in the last panel. Maybe kids are a trigger for premature aging? Something to ponder.

So, these kids are brats all day long. Hmm. What is it we're supposed to like about this family again?

Also, there's no way Mike could write with this kind of constant chaos.

12:37 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Is Mike supposed to be writing full-time as well as being a full-time SAHD? What quality of care are these kids getting? From memory, they are both too young for school, aren't they? So what does he do with them while he's writing, stick them in front of Playschool (or whatever the Canadian equivalent is)?

Mel

1:24 AM  
Blogger DreadedCandiru2 said...

I have a feeling that he might very soon pour his heart out to Elly about how he was never that bad at that age. That would mean we're in for another week of flashbacks with the theme "See these wrinkles? YOU PUT THEM THERE!!" To be honest, I'd actually like to see that because it would mean there was a point to this other than "Kids are naughty".

3:06 AM  
Blogger April Patterson said...

Mel, Meredith is five years old and in kindergarten. Robin is three. According to one of the monthly letters, Robin is in a daycare that's housed at Meredith's school. However, this has been contradicted in a strip where Elly babysits because Robin's regular babysitter was unavailable.

5:37 AM  
Blogger howard said...

Mel,

I have been working on the presumption that this story occurs during the day after he has picked up Meredith from kindergarten, after Robin's sitter has left and before Deanna has come home from the pharmacy. This is because he mentions the kids have had lunch, he is preparing supper, and he calls Deanna at work about the peeler.

6:03 AM  
Blogger howard said...

qnjones,

Mike looks a lot like Grandpa Jim in the last panel. Maybe kids are a trigger for premature aging? Something to ponder.

I agree. As far as starting to look like an older character, he has skipped right over John and gone straight to Grandpa. Possibly this is because Mike is attractive as a young man, as Grandpa Jim was, and John Patterson never was.

So, these kids are brats all day long. Hmm. What is it we're supposed to like about this family again?
Think Dennis the Menace, except without the humour and intelligence.

6:06 AM  
Blogger howard said...

dreadedcandiru2,

I have a feeling that he might very soon pour his heart out to Elly about how he was never that bad at that age. That would mean we're in for another week of flashbacks with the theme "See these wrinkles? YOU PUT THEM THERE!!"

You're right. I think it will be Elly or Deanna who will get some Mike contrition. I doubt this sequence will end with just Mike.

6:08 AM  
Blogger DreadedCandiru2 said...

Perhaps, if we do have an extended sequence with Elly, we'll have her complaining about how expensive raising children is. What'll make that fun is how miserly the Pattersons are. You are, of course, right about the fact that they practically expect April to pay her own way now no matter how much they make. Elly puts me mind of a woman I'd read about once; even though she was rich, she lived and died in squalor because she was too crabbed up to crack open her wallet.

9:03 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Think Dennis the Menace, except without the humour and intelligence.

Talk about an indictment of the strip's quality!

11:09 AM  
Blogger howard said...

dreadedcandiru2,

Perhaps, if we do have an extended sequence with Elly, we'll have her complaining about how expensive raising children is.
That would be different. With modern Elly, I cannot imagine any strip where she would complain about the grandchildren in any way.

12:57 PM  
Blogger howard said...

James

Think Dennis the Menace, except without the humour and intelligence.
Talk about an indictment of the strip's quality!


OK. Think about old Dennis the Menace done by Hank Ketchum.

12:57 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Howard:

I'm going to have to plead ignorance on the Hank Ketcham-drawn strips.

2:56 PM  
Blogger howard said...

james,

There are some old Ketchum strips over at this link, in case you are interested.

5:11 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home