Wednesday, October 22, 2008

Wandering in the Rain – Looking for a Plot

If I were to attack today’s For Better or For Worse on the basis of poor parenting, the obvious point to make would be that Elly’s parting words to young Michael playing in the rain should not be “Don’t go getting wet!!” ; but should be “If you hear thunder or see lightning, you need to come inside.” However, the main point of this strip seems to be the joke that Elly is telling young Michael not only the wrong thing, but something that makes little sense considering where he is and what he plans to do.

She says it out of habit, I suppose; but that raises the issue of why she would say it out of habit. Possibly she is saying that because young Michael usually goes out into the rain without his rain gear. However, there is another possible reason. In order to know that reason, you have to know the “April rescued from the ravine waters by Farley” story, and the fact that there is a ravine close by the Patterson house where there is a regular water flow. Saying it out of habit would mean that Elly regularly tries to keep Mike from getting in that water.

We don’t know which one, and it doesn’t really matter for the purpose of this strip. This could have just as easily have been Mike going to play in the grass and Elly says, “Don’t get any grass stains on your clothes” or Mike going to play in the dirt and Elly says “Don’t get dirty” or rather “Don’t go getting dirty!!!!” Is that way of phrasing things a Canadianism? If I look at a recent strip, covering the same ground, Deanna says, “Don’t go XXXX-ing” several times to Meredith and Robin. Considering the example of that strip with Deanna, then maybe Elly really does expect young Michael to play in the rain without getting wet.

The other odd thing about the sequence of strips this week, is how we have gone from little Lizzie just learning to walk to Lizzie out in full rain regalia and able to play in the rain. Frankly I would think that this would be beyond the skills of a newly-learned walker. However, there they are out in the rain and little Lizzie seems to walk great after such a short time of learning. Maybe the point of Lizzie walking is so that she can play in the rain, and the point of playing in the rain is so that Michael can be left playing in the rain, and the point of leaving Michael in the rain is that he uncovers Farley the wonder puppy, just 9 days away from his scheduled deadline of reappearing in the month of October. Who knows? I look at the strips this week wondering where the story could possibly be going, and I still have no clue.

As for me, I have fond memories of my kids playing in the rain. In Arizona, the soil is terrible for absorbing water and so we often have the large mudless puddles that come up in our yard during a rain. When my kids were smaller, they enjoyed going out in the rain to play in the puddles, like they were little miniature swimming pools. Of course in Arizona, saying, “Don’t go getting wet!!” is definitely not a reflex command for parents, especially in Tucson where we have something like 340 days of sunshine a year.

15 Comments:

Anonymous Anonymous said...

I used to love to play in the rain. Even at the age of 31, I secretly love it when I get caught in the rain and soaked to the skin. Happened twice last year, and I was in heaven. Fortunately, I do not live with an Elly. I live with two cats who like to lick the water off the linoleum when I come inside.

My parents did a lot of things wrong, but they also did some things right. And one thing my mom got right was that she never yelled at us for getting wet or dirty so long as we remembered to strip on the porch.

Come to think of it, this is one thing I always wondered about Lynn. Elly never seemed to come up with ways to cope with/contain the messes that children and pets can make. From what I've observed, that's not normal behavior for a mom. I wonder if Lynn had that kind of victim mentality herself, never thinking ahead to prevent disaster, or if she just drew Elly that way.

12:57 AM  
Blogger DreadedCandiru2 said...

qnjones,

I wonder if Lynn had that kind of victim mentality herself, never thinking ahead to prevent disaster, or if she just drew Elly that way.

Since she also drew Deanna that way, it seems to me that she was terrible at anticipating the obvious. Like you said, that isn't normal; most mothers figure out how to deal sooner or later but Elly never did. Remember "I quit motherhood" and what caused her to say it?

2:25 AM  
Blogger DreadedCandiru2 said...

howard,

However, the main point of this strip seems to be the joke that Elly is telling young Michael not only the wrong thing, but something that makes little sense considering where he is and what he plans to do.

Ive noticed that the Pattersons seem to think that children should be able to have lots of fun staring into space or listening to boring old people talk about things that don't interest them. This accompanies a strong need they have to not do or allow things children might like for fear of being confused with a child. I vaguly remember the cross-country trip they took to fetch Jim; they zoomed past an amusement park to make time so Liz and April could have big fun sitting until numb and keeping their mouths shut as John talked to some jerk he hadn't seen in ages.

2:31 AM  
Blogger howard said...

qnjones,

I wonder if Lynn had that kind of victim mentality herself, never thinking ahead to prevent disaster, or if she just drew Elly that way.

One of the things I have noticed with going back to reprints from the first year, is that Elly’s unhinged jaw shrieking, clearly originated from Peanuts characters who used to do the same thing for comic effect. The shrieking is one of the few things that Lynn adopted from Charles Schulz which she has kept throughout all the years of her comic strip. The difference is that in Peanuts, Charles Schulz would let you know that it was for comic effect by having the other characters do flips in the air at the sound of it. Plus it was always kids yelling at other kids, and not an adult, so no parenting issues came up. After seeing how passive Lynn is during video interviews, I have a hard time imagining the shrieking to be anything but this thing Lynn thinks is funny going all the way back to when she cribbed it from Sparky.

As for thinking ahead to prevent disaster, that is a different story. Lynn has told some outrageous stories of her poor parenting in times past, like the one where she threw infant Aaron out in the snow. The only thing I can think of, when it comes to preventing disaster in her personal life, was her comment in one interview about knowing there were problems in her marriage and her decision not to address them until she was retired.

7:07 AM  
Blogger howard said...

dreadedcandiru2,

I vaguely remember the cross-country trip they took to fetch Jim; they zoomed past an amusement park to make time so Liz and April could have big fun sitting until numb and keeping their mouths shut as John talked to some jerk he hadn't seen in ages

That tendency continued into their older years with April. The Patterson parents were constantly going on vacation by themselves and leaving April with friends. I can’t think of a time when the elder Pattersons ever took April to any place fun.

7:09 AM  
Blogger DreadedCandiru2 said...

howard,

I can’t think of a time when the elder Pattersons ever took April to any place fun.

Neither can I. What I can remember is that the one time she wouldn't have minded having been left with friends, she got dragged against her will to an exercise in tedium and futility: Liz's graduation from University. Elly acted like April's natural unwillingness to go to a place where she'd be surrounded by old people doing dull things that meant nothing to her was a crime against nature. Simply put, the woman doesn't want children to BE children and never did. It's probably because she's incapable of enjoying anything and wants to destroy the capacity in others.

7:37 AM  
Blogger howard said...

DreadedCandiru2,

What I can remember is that the one time she wouldn't have minded having been left with friends, she got dragged against her will to an exercise in tedium and futility: Liz's graduation from University.

Lynn Johnston completely misplayed Liz’s graduation. In Liz’s monthly letter at the time, she mentioned a whole raft and ream of relatives she had not seen in ages who came out to see her graduate. Instead of showing this, we got to see the same thing we always seemed to see with Liz, her romantic life. Warren helicopters in, and then she ditches her family to go to some kind of graduation dance where she has yet another tearful farewell (She did that a lot with Warren.) As for April, there should have been plenty of opportunity to mingle with people other than Elly and John, but that was not shown. Just her excitement over seeing Liz with a hunk like Warren.

8:44 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

howard

That tendency continued into their older years with April. The Patterson parents were constantly going on vacation by themselves and leaving April with friends. I can’t think of a time when the elder Pattersons ever took April to any place fun.

This is something that always bothered me. I never understood why John and Elly abandoned April and for a time Liz while they went on vacation. I never heard of this happening to any of my friends or classmates. The only time I ever saw examples oftheis happening occurred when we were watching a show where very rich people or just simply out of touch parents would dump their kids off on unsuspecting relatives and a "very special episode" ensued. In other words this seems like a habit held only by rich or out of touch parents.
I also seem to remember in the early days of Foob the family did go out on several camping trips but this tradition was far gone by the time April came around. I can only imagine how April must have felt as she looked through these camping photos and realized she was never included in such activities and never would be.

10:03 AM  
Blogger howard said...

ruth,

I also seem to remember in the early days of Foob the family did go out on several camping trips but this tradition was far gone by the time April came around.

Lynn Johnston puts so much of her own life into For Better or For Worse, she seemed to have a hard time getting around the idea that Elly Patterson still had a child at home, when Lynn did not. So, when Lynn and Rod would vacation to Mexico, they had Elly and John do the same without any children with them.

11:04 AM  
Blogger DreadedCandiru2 said...

howard,

Lynn Johnston puts so much of her own life into For Better or For Worse, she seemed to have a hard time getting around the idea that Elly Patterson still had a child at home, when Lynn did not.

It was about then that the rot had started to creep into the strip; she should have made the time to remember that Elly had a responsibility she didn't. If Coffee Talk had been running then, she'd have come up with some justification for what looks like neglect. Perhaps she'd end up saying that John and Elly made an honest mistake and misread the relevant laws in Mexico about traveling with minors; they didn't MEAN to leave April out but in well-meaning ignorance thought they had no choice.

11:24 AM  
Blogger howard said...

dreadedcandiru2,

It was about then that the rot had started to creep into the strip; she should have made the time to remember that Elly had a responsibility she didn't.

Well, it just wasn't leaving out April that this affected. Lynn moved to the point where every character's voice started sounding the same as Lynn's, even the grandchildren to a certain degree. However, I will grant you that Coffee Talk did cause Lynn to realize some things, like just how many people hated Anthony Caine and why. Perhaps she would have come up with an excuse, or maybe just whined that we should have read between the lines and known that John and Elly planned to take April, but there was some excuse, like March break wasn't long enough for the length of vacation they planned or something stupid like that.

2:04 PM  
Blogger DreadedCandiru2 said...

howard,

Perhaps she would have come up with an excuse, or maybe just whined that we should have read between the lines and known that John and Elly planned to take April, but there was some excuse, like March break wasn't long enough for the length of vacation they planned or something stupid like that.

I'd say something like the latter would be more likely. Taking the time to reason out that John and Elly made an honest mistake takes too much time. Whining about us asking unfair questions takes no time at all.

2:37 PM  
Blogger howard said...

dreadedcandiru2,

Whining about us asking unfair questions takes no time at all.

Exactly. Like with Shania Twain. Instead of admitting she could have made a better choice if she were up on current popular, good-looking but stupid women; she had to rant about how she was doing the best she could.

2:49 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

I do have to address the comment "Current, popular, but stupid women"... Shania hasn't made her divorce a public 'affair' that way other women have. I'd say Shania is playing it smart.

6:43 PM  
Blogger howard said...

anonymous,

I'd say Shania is playing it smart.

Quite a few people also took exception to the idea that Shania was current, and therefore the new-runs should have been set about 10 years ago.

10:36 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home