Saturday, April 05, 2008

Cutting Hair and Nail Trauma

I remember cutting my son’s fingernails and toenails. He hated having his toenails and fingernails cut with a passion, and fought against it with every ounce of his strength. The question then arises, why bother going through the process? Well, my son’s fingernails were like little razorblades. They were so thin and so sharp, they cut us when we were with him, and they cut him if he scratched at anything, especially his face. The alternative of duct-taping gloves to his hands didn’t seem very practical. In retrospect, his resistance to it was probably an aspect of the Sensory Integration part of his Asperger’s Syndrome; but neither I nor my wife knew that at the time. It wasn’t until he was 4 years old, before he had pediatrician that had a clue. The rest of them kept on handing us books on how to discipline children.

To avoid these kinds of struggles, my wife tried to cut his nails while he was sleeping. She had been given that advice by someone who had done it effectively; but my son would have none of it. The moment he sensed someone was at his toes or his fingers, he was instantly awake. Ultimately we ended up tag-teaming him. He was too strong for either one of us to cut his nails by ourselves, without worrying about injuring him. I would sit him in my lap and restrain his legs, body, and one arm with my legs, body, and arms; while my wife would try to control the other arm with the nails while she cut them. He fought this so hard, he was usually covered in sweat by the time we were done. As for me, I was amazed at how powerful a little baby could be.

I asked my wife when we stopped doing that and she can’t remember. She kept scrapbooks with pictures of certain majour events, but for some reason this was not one of them. My guess is that it was somewhere between his first and second year of life, because I don’t remember doing it after his sister came in being. Eventually he grew to be old enough to accept fingernail cutting and learned to cut his own fingernails; but he still hates it, even to this day.

As for haircutting, my boy came into life with a full head of red hair, but rubbed it all off and started growing blonde hair instead. His first hair cut was shortly after his first birthday. My wife took him to her haircutter and she gave him hair clips to play with and distract him (a technique which did not work with fingernail cutting). This we have scrapbook pictures of, including a before and after picture of him holding and chewing on hairclips, where he looks pretty happy in both pictures. He was still pretty squirmy with haircuts, but eventually he has grown to be old enough to tell the haircutter how he wants his hair to be cut, and lets us know when he needs a haircut.

In the interim period of time, my wife learned and was often told by the hair salon managers, which haircutters were really good with and enjoyed cutting kids’ hair. This little detail makes an enormous difference. My boy probably would have fought his early haircuts a lot harder had we not been aware of this fact. They went to the same kid-friendly haircutter at the same salon every time. Let me tell you the secret: When the kid is distracted, even for an instant, the scissors go to work and can get everything you would want done in a kid’s haircut in a matter of minutes. If the haircutter is really good, the kid will unaware his hair is even being cut.

As for my daughter, no problems. She let her mother cut her fingernails. She enjoyed getting her hair cut from the very time it happened, and seemed to relish the attention. The girl was meant to go to a spa.

The big difference between today’s For Better or For Worse, and what would make the strip work for me is the understanding that Deanna and Michael have moved to Milborough and are having a hard time finding that kid-friendly haircutter. Maybe they have been making the trip back to Toronto to get Robin’s hair cut, at the place he has been going to since he was 1 year old. Maybe gasoline prices have grown so expensive that they don’t want to make that trip to Toronto to do that and they are seeking alternatives. Without that information, what you get is a kid who is 3 years and 5 months old, who should have been getting haircuts for at least 2 years, and he is still not grown up enough to do it.

The alternative explanation is that Robin has, as has often been suggested from watching him over the last few years, development problems. Maybe he has sensory issues in excess of those of my son. Someone should be saying to Deanna that she shouldn’t be having these kinds of problems with Robin at his age. She should not need to have to cut his hair or toenails at night, and she needs to seek help for her son. Oh, the conversation I would have with Deanna Patterson, if I knew her.

Of course, the real alternative is that Lynn Johnston has written Robin into the role of having all the early childhood situations associated with him for plotting purposes, without any consideration of his real-time age from his birthdate. If she hears some story of something some mom did, and the story applies to a kid in the 0.5 – 3 year age range, then Robin gets that story. Meredith Patterson gets all the older sibling stories. Françoise Caine gets all the child of divorce and step-child stories. This is not new for Lynn Johnston. April stayed at “Aypo” age for years past when she should for no other obvious reason than, if Aypo grew up, then there would be no one to carry the young kid stories.

What is boils down to is that Lynn heard a story about some mom cutting their kid's hair while he was asleep and Robin gets that story.

8 Comments:

Anonymous Anonymous said...

April stayed at “Aypo” age for years past when she should for no other obvious reason than, if Aypo grew up, then there would be no one to carry the young kid stories.

I was convinced that April was not aging in realtime, that Lynn had switched to the "x-years and holding" pattern of most comics with kids in them. And then April was suddenly much more mature and brought up to realtime again! That really annoyed me, because it suddenly made April look like she'd spent much of her youth "mentally challenged" before getting a "miracle cure".

10:21 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

howtheduck:

That is, of course, the right answer to this puzzling problem. It doesn't seem to matter to Lynn all that much that she's making her characters look foolish just as long as she gets a funny strip out of it.

3:33 AM  
Blogger April Patterson said...

howtheduck, I think your theory that Lynn just wants to dump all the baby/toddler stories on Robin is exactly right. Anonymous, the thing with Aypo was that she was having birthdays and advancing a grade each year--Lynn was just ignoring development for way too long!

6:27 AM  
Blogger howard said...

Anonymous,

April stayed at “Aypo” age for years past when she should for no other obvious reason than, if Aypo grew up, then there would be no one to carry the young kid stories.

The other thing which was interesting about Aypo, was that long after Aypo had been turned into April, when the Patterson family was drawn for publicity reasons or for advertisements, Aypo would invariably reappear. Lynn seemed to have a real problem developing April without turning her into another version of Liz. Even now, when Liz and April are together, Lynn often resorts to turning April back into the annoying younger sibling.

8:48 AM  
Blogger howard said...

dreadedcandiru2,

It doesn't seem to matter to Lynn all that much that she's making her characters look foolish just as long as she gets a funny strip out of it.

I am sure that when it comes to kids, Lynn has long wished that she didn’t do that aging in real time, with celebrating characters' birthdays in the strip. Every birthday April had was a reminder that she wasn’t little Aypo any more. You will notice that Meredith and Robin have not had a birthday in the strip for awhile now.

Some of the stories she has done with Robin and Meredith recently would require quite a bit of effort to research the exact age they are and the language development they would have at those ages. And then, she would have to figure out a way to put the joke across given that Robin and Merrie only know so many words. That would be tough to do, and I can understand why she doesn’t do it. However, it is these differences that separate her strip from a truly great one.

8:50 AM  
Blogger DreadedCandiru2 said...

At least she can console herself with having the greatest comic strip ever drawn by a resident of the North Bay area;)

1:42 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

dreadedcandiru2,

It doesn't seem to matter to Lynn all that much that she's making her characters look foolish just as long as she gets a funny strip out of it.

Well, it is called a comic strip...

In rare moments, when I am more objective, I recognize that many of the vintage strips are good. So why do I hate them? Maybe it's because they seem to be static, as old photos often are.

I would describe Lynn's best work as a tapestry of short stories that are dynamic. In these stories I am able to see other people more than myself. Lynn's very early work makes me feel like I'm walking down the street staring into glass windows. As I focus on my reflection I miss the world around me.

I love the strip Howard linked yesterday - where Elizabeth wants to ride a motorcycle over the summer - because I understand how each character feels. I wonder if this strip (as well as so many others) will endure the test of time...


Anon NYC

3:33 PM  
Blogger howard said...

Anon NYC

In rare moments, when I am more objective, I recognize that many of the vintage strips are good.

I agree with you. In the ones reprinted so far since last summer, I have found that if the subject stays off of "Michael is an out-of-control kid" and "Elly is a put-upon mother" and "John is a male chauvinist pig"; the strips reprinted have not been bad. I thought the strip this week with Elly criticizing John and Michael and then John commenting to Michael about how criticizing him is Elly's job may not have portrayed an especially nice family moment, but I could definitely see it happening in a family and it was funny with the "not over the top" comic reactions.

I wonder if this strip (as well as so many others) will endure the test of time...

That is a tricky question and a difficult one to answer. Work that endures the test of time in this field is generally work like Peanuts, which used very few topical references. Parts of it, like Snoopy's fight with the Red Baron on his Sopwith Camel still work, but after some point it would require someone to look up the Red Baron and Sopwith Camels to understand the humour. In Charles Schulz's favour is a very consistent art style with very little change from the 1950s until the 1990s.

If you want to talk about strips that last the test of time, then you can't do any better than Hal Foster's Prince Valiant, which was magnificently drawn and at the time of its conception drew upon Arthurian legend which had already stood the test of time. Another one which usually makes the list is Winsor McKay's Little Nemo in Slumberland, whose art style is generally admired even today and whose fantasy stories rarely touched on anything topical except for, unfortunately, the way African Americans were depicted.

As we have seen with just the first year reprinted from For Better or For Worse, there are some strips that still work, and there are some strips which seem extremely dated and politically incorrect by modern standards. Also working against the strip is the very poor art in the beginning years of the strip and disappointingly for me, also in the final several months of the strip. However, in Lynn's favour are several years where she really hit her stride and the art and the stories were very consistent and really plugged into daily family life. I still get a pleasure from reading those. I expect that part of the work could stand the test of time.

That's typical for a lot of artists. Sometimes they produce a few great works and number of mediocre ones. Perhaps people will think of For Better or For Worse the same way, and really, if you read the Coffee Talk comments, they do. People remember the Farley death story and the Lawrence coming out story, and those are often sited.

9:06 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home